{"id":9588,"date":"2021-05-18T06:41:59","date_gmt":"2021-05-18T06:41:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/media-archive.blackartinamerica.com\/?p=9588"},"modified":"2021-05-19T18:13:02","modified_gmt":"2021-05-19T18:13:02","slug":"the-urgent-need-to-train-writers-to-effectively-explain-black-art","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthexhibitions.org\/media-archive\/?p=9588","title":{"rendered":"The Urgent Need To Train Writers To Effectively Explain Black Art"},"content":{"rendered":"
By Richard Allen May III and Natasha Gural<\/pre>\nAppreciating art is an intrinsic part of human life, enabling us to understand the human condition by blistering interaction with others and the world in general. Visual art can heal, emotionally and physically. It teaches us about cultures and traditions that shape our worldview. Art tells stories, sparks inspiration, and fuels thinking. But not everyone can gaze at a canvas or a tapestry or a monumental installation and feel an immediate connection. Contemporary art is especially challenging, even for folks who have an understanding of art history and the creative process, as the meaning is often buried in abstraction or other messages. Art viewers rely on writers who can clearly yet eloquently describe what we\u2019re viewing and the important critical, social, and historical context of each work.<\/p>\n
More problematic, the theoretical framework of many past survey texts on African American art was limited to a formalist, biographical, historical approach. There is an urgent need for trained writers who consistently produce art reviews, catalogue essays, and books that analyze African American art from an interdisciplinary, critical perspective employing various types of methodologies, as well as creating new ways to discuss the work while at the same time making it accessible to readers. There continues to be a plethora of African American artists who create work worthy of unpacking and deconstructing, but a dearth of art writers who are equipped for such rigorous analysis. More worrisome is the dearth of African American writers who can effectively write about African American art.<\/p>\n
Besides exhibition catalogues,\u00a0 the availability of\u00a0 two publications on African American art before the Black Arts Movement foreshadowed the necessity for more art writers. These were Modern Negro Art by James Porter (1943) and American Negro Art by Cedic Dover (1960). Similarly, additional survey texts on African American art near the zenith of the Black Arts Movement were published. In retrospect, these texts filled art-historical canon gaps, but through a myopic lens regarding critical analysis.<\/p>\n
The early 20th century had key individuals. First, there was Alain Locke, aesthetic architect of the Harlem Renaissance, founder of the \u201cNew Negro\u201d movement in the mid-1920s, first African American Rhodes Scholar and professor of philosophy at Howard University for over forty years. Then, there was James Porter- artist, art professor, head of Howard University Art Department. Although Locke and Porter disagreed on the \u201clook\u201d of Black art, both represented two streams of thought leading to a larger ocean-namely the critical review, documentation, preservation and recognition\u00a0 of African American artists.<\/p>\n
The mid- to late-20th century brought Dr. Samella Lewis,\u00a0 first African American\u00a0 earning a Ph.D. in art history.\u00a0 The value of art writers was evident in her establishing the\u00a0 International Review of African American Art journal. Lewis along with Ruth Waddy, printmaker and founder of Art West Associated, also wrote Black Artists on Art Volume 1 ( 1969 ) and Black Artists on Art Volume 2 ( 1971).<\/p>\n