{"id":7991,"date":"2020-09-01T11:41:42","date_gmt":"2020-09-01T11:41:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/media-archive.blackartinamerica.com\/?p=7991"},"modified":"2020-09-01T11:45:34","modified_gmt":"2020-09-01T11:45:34","slug":"still-life-reckoning-with-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthexhibitions.org\/media-archive\/?p=7991","title":{"rendered":"Still Life: Reckoning with Time"},"content":{"rendered":"
By Shantay Robinson<\/span><\/pre>\nStill life paintings have historically been recognized at the lowest rung in the hierarchy of genres of art. While history painting ranks number one and portrait painting ranks number two, still life is at the bottom, with genre, landscape, and animal painting ranking higher.\u00a0 Given this low regard, still life painting has meandered in and out of fashion over the past five centuries.\u00a0 Its origins, in the contemporary sense, are in the Middle Ages and the Ancient Greco-Roman eras. Though the genre was categorized and popularized by early Europeans, still life paintings can be found in the tombs of Ancient Egypt inspired by the belief the images would become real and available for sustenance in the afterlife.\u00a0 Though less lofty in modern times, still life has taken many formations and variations.\u00a0 Artists like Picasso and Braque brought inanimate objects like musical instruments to life with a Cubist transformation to the traditional still life. Duchamp created 3-D readymade still life artworks. And Warhol\u2019s Campbell Soup cans made still life en masse.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nAlthough still life painting has wavered in popularity over time, African American contributors to the canon of still life paintings have not been highlighted in the way artists of other genres have.\u00a0 When looking at the scholarship on the history of African American artists, still life painting is rare.\u00a0 But a closer look reveals they were there, are there, and have contributed greatly to the genre.\u00a0 Generally regarded as decorative art, African American still life painting may be less favored by collectors and art institutions because so much of the story African Americans tell is not typically represented in still life.\u00a0 But still life paintings tell their own stories. In European traditions, they told the stories of ephemerality and the sacredness of life, as some still life painting show rotting fruit or include images of skulls along with vegetation.\u00a0 The term still life was derived from the Dutch word <\/span>stilleven<\/span><\/i> and, in Italian, the term used is<\/span> natura morta<\/span><\/i>, both meaning \u2018dead nature.\u2019\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMost recognizable still life paintings include fruit, vegetables, and flowers in bounty. They allude to rich natural resources and, in that way, appealed to a certain audience when in fashion in European countries like Spain, France, Italy, and the Netherlands.\u00a0 European cultures regarded the still life for its use of religious symbols, flowers, and other objects.\u00a0 But the beauty in still life painting is further regarded for its <\/span>trope l\u2019oeil<\/span><\/i> or deceptive nature.\u00a0 The ability to make the inanimate objects in the painting fool the eye is a skill mastered and used before the age of photography. Even today, though photography is rampant, the artist\u2019s ability to trick the eye is a highly valued skill as witnessed through the popularity of portrait paintings by African American artists.\u00a0 Despite its low regard, still life painting can exhibit the superior skill of an artist in the same way as any other genre.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n