{"id":7890,"date":"2020-08-11T14:32:03","date_gmt":"2020-08-11T14:32:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/media-archive.blackartinamerica.com\/?p=7890"},"modified":"2020-08-11T14:32:30","modified_gmt":"2020-08-11T14:32:30","slug":"activating-an-afrofemcentric-critique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthexhibitions.org\/media-archive\/?p=7890","title":{"rendered":"Activating an Afrofemcentric Critique\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

Activating an Afrofemcentric Critique\u00a0<\/span><\/h1>\n
by Shantay Robinson<\/pre>\n

Barbara Smith invokes in her seminal 1978 essay, \u201cToward a Black Feminist Criticism,\u201d that her goal in developing a Black feminist criticism is to reveal \u201cthe state of Black women\u2019s culture and the intensity of <\/span>all<\/span><\/i> Black women\u2019s oppression.\u201d The primary oppressions Black women historically endured have been based on race, gender, and class; this trifecta has been given many names, but I will refer to it as intersecting identities.\u00a0 While Black feminist theory emerged as early as 1892, with intersecting identities at its heart, the conversation around this marginalization is still relevant today.\u00a0 It was Kimberle Crenshaw\u2019s seminal 1989 essay, \u201cDemarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics,\u201d that popularized the term intersectionality to the larger scholarly community.\u00a0 This theory has real repercussions for Black women, Black feminists, and Black women artists.\u00a0 Intersectionality is not just theory for Black women; it constitutes their lived experiences in the United States.\u00a0 To critically assess meaning of Black women\u2019s artwork, an understanding of intersectionality is necessary, as Afrofemcentrism acknowledges.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

“Gilded Goddess” by Lavett Ballard — Artwork available through BAIA at buyblackart.com<\/p><\/div>\n

Afrofemcentrism, a term coined by Frieda High W. Tesfagiorgis in 1984, is central to the evaluation of Black women\u2019s art as it pays particular attention to the intersecting identities of race, class, and gender, three social identity strata that oppress Black women living in the United States. Though Afrofemcentrism is not widely used in African American art criticism today, Jontyle Theresa Robinson and Lowery Stokes Sims employ the framework in a catalogue for <\/span>Bearing Witness<\/span><\/i>,<\/span> a 1996 exhibition of Black women artists at Spelman College. Robinson states that High \u201cuses her Afrofemcentrist construct to examine the ideas and representative artworks of Black women artists and to reveal and clarify the uniqueness of their self-depiction, thereby encouraging greater appreciation of form and technique.\u201d The framework of Afrofemcentrism, although more than 30 years in the making, has been quietly existing among Black women artists and their artworks without the supporting scholarship to explicate their salience. Developing a criticism like Afrofemcentrism that teases out the effective parts of artworks makes them relevant and empowering to Black women\u2019s experiences, and important in the meaning of their lives.<\/span><\/p>\n

The connection between race, gender, and class when discussing justice in the United States leaves Black women tied to the struggle for all three fights.\u00a0 Today, while there are more minority groups in the U.S. than ever before, historically, Black women have been the most oppressed.\u00a0 Though Black women are not a monolith and their individual experiences are considered, most Black women contend with the issues of racism, sexism, and classism.\u00a0 Black women do not have the fortune to adhere to a single-issue framework like other historically oppressed people in this country, namely Black men who fight for racial justice and white women who fight for gender justice.\u00a0 Black women, as they climb class structures through education, remain less compensated for their work.\u00a0 So, when we think about Black women and their lived experiences, it is necessary to account for how their race, gender, and class factor into important decisions that dictate their livelihoods.\u00a0 As Afrofemcentrism takes these intersecting identities into account, it is crucial that Black women\u2019s art not only be assessed for the formal qualities, but also how it attends to the issues Black women face as a community.\u00a0 And this is what Afrofemcentrism does. It not only looks at Black women\u2019s art for its aesthetics, but it digs deeper to critique how it conveys Black women\u2019s lived experience.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

”Faces For Two Worlds” by Elizabeth Catlett — Artwork available through BAIA at buyblackart.com<\/p><\/div>\n

Revisiting Afrofemcentrism as a framework could have great consequences for developing criticism of Black women artists\u2019 artwork.\u00a0 Gaining a better understanding of African American women\u2019s artwork could inevitably relate to a better understanding of Black women\u2019s inner lives.\u00a0 Using Afrofemcentrism to tease out the relevance in artworks could help interpret the art\u2019s effectiveness. In \u201cIn Search of Discourse and Critique\/s that Center the Art of Black Women Artists,\u201d Tesfagiorgis states that \u201c[Afrofemcentrism] focuses on the Black woman subject as depicted by the Black woman artist, exploring the distinct manner in which the latter envisions and present Black women\u2019s realities.\u201d Though Tesfagiorgis\u2019 framework is about art, it relies on the canon of Black feminist theory that considers the intersecting identities first discussed by Anna Julia Cooper\u2019s 1892 <\/span>A Voice from the South<\/span><\/i>.\u00a0 In \u201cAfrofemcentrism and its Fruition in the Art of Elizabeth Catlett and Faith Ringgold,\u201d Tesfagiogris notes that race, sex, and artistic ability direct the work of Black women artists.\u00a0 That Tesfagiorgis is taking up the charge to use intersecting identities to theorize the work of Black women artists testifies to its necessity and salience more than 100 years since the concept had been introduced by Cooper.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Artist, Adrian Piper, addresses intersecting identities from a somewhat different perspective as her assessment has less to do with feminism and more to do with artistry. In her 1990 essay, \u201cThe Triple Negation of Colored Women Artists,\u201d Piper writes, \u201c\u2026the very different concerns that may find expression in the art of CWAs [Colored Women Artists] \u2013 identity, autobiography, selfhood, racism, ethnic tradition, gender issues, spirituality, etc. \u2013 constitute a triple barreled threat.\u201d She states that because Black women, in the face of prejudice, repression, and exclusion, are still optimistic in their artwork and they do not pose a postmodernist attitude of nihilism and mourning, Black women artists are negated from the Euroethnic artworld.\u00a0 While Piper\u2019s essay contributes to why Black women are not more prominent in the artworld as she explains the zero-sum game played amongst artists, she captures how Black women are marginalized in the artworld at the time of the essay\u2019s writing.\u00a0 Piper identifies a slightly different set of intersecting identities; she notes race, gender, and profession when speaking particularly of Black women artists.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Femme Totem Blue by Masa Zodros — Artwork available through BAIA at buyblackart.com<\/p><\/div>\n

Although Tesfagiorgis claims that Black feminist theory is less applicable for looking at the work of Black women artists, Afrofemcentricity is tied to Black feminist theory in the ways it looks at race, gender, class, and sexuality for their abilities to make meaning of the work. Afrofemcentricism is unique in the way it looks at how Black women artists are \u201cactively engaged in the circumstances of the moment.\u201d In thinking about the tenets for Afrofemcentrism and how they relate to the work of Black women artists, we might want to see if there is a distinct difference between the treatment of Black women as subject or object in the work of Black women as opposed to the work of others. Because the Black woman is subject as opposed to object, does she convey a different type of gaze when painted or pictured in the work of Black women?\u00a0 Is she overtly sexualized or merely sexual? Comparing the Black woman as subject versus object in the work of Black women to the work of artists of any other identity should provide a sense of the difference the identity of the artist makes when producing an image of the Black woman.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

As a tenet of Afrofemcentrism, Tesfagiorgis calls for the eradication of universal truths. The idea that universal truths should be eradicated plays into issues of representation for Black women\u2019s lives given Western philosophy normalizes Western ideas while rendering other cultures abnormal and deviant.\u00a0 Recognizing both African and European traditions is essential for African American woman artists because they are products of both cultures. While embracing African traditions, they also play a role in the Western art tradition through their training, schooling, and lived experiences.\u00a0 By acknowledging both cultures, they claim space in Black and European art circles.\u00a0 The hierarchy is dismantled in Afrofemcentric works because when Black women become central figures in artworks, they disrupt the hierarchy favoring white male interests.\u00a0 When putting the interests of Black women at the forefront, Black women artists are effacing the hierarchy in a way that claims their interests are valid.\u00a0 As Anna Julia Cooper claims with her famous statement of the Black woman\u2019s position, \u201cWhen and where I enter in the quietly, undisputed dignity of my womanhood, without violence and without suing or special patronage, then and there the whole race enters with me.\u201d Black women who obstruct this hierarchy are giving power to all others who want their interests known and entr\u00e9e on to the world\u2019s stage to express their artistry to a wider audience.<\/span><\/p>\n

Patricia Hill Collins makes a case for Black feminist epistemologies in <\/span>Black Feminist Thought<\/span><\/i> where she accounts for the artistic contributions of Black women in counter-cultural spaces given the dominance of white-male-controlled institutions.\u00a0 She notes that intersectionality explains the social phenomena that is Black women\u2019s artistic production.\u00a0 But what is most additive to this discussion is her claim that \u201c\u2026 Black women intellectuals often encounter two distinct epistemologies: one representing elite White male interests and the other expressing Black feminist concerns.\u201d In an Afrofemcentric reading of an artwork it could be assumed that the epistemological framework of an artwork exists within Black cultural knowledge.\u00a0 Though this in not the case with all works of art created by Black women, if the work is Afrofemcentric, by definition it is derived from an Afrocentric and Black feminist perspective. Knowing this, the critic approaching a work by a Black woman can assess it for its Afrofemcentric appeal.\u00a0 Criticizing any form of artistic creation comes with a certain amount of risks; without the proper research or knowledge, the unknowing critic could essentially miss the mark.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

“Mother and Child” by Dr. Samella Lewis — Artwork available through BAIA at buyblackart.com<\/p><\/div>\n

Critics writing about Black women\u2019s artwork may stick to formal qualities although a work may exude socio-political content, a reason why Black women critics such as Deborah Chay in \u201cRereading Barbara Smith: Black Feminist Criticism and the Category of Experience\u201d feel that roles like hers should belong to Black women, \u201clegitimate practitioners of Black feminist criticism.\u201d The work of Black feminist criticism is necessary, and \u201cothers\u201d may not initially understand a work of art drenched in racial or gendered sub-context.\u00a0 Chay cites Joan Scott, as she explains \u201cthe evidence of experience,\u201d noting \u201cBlack women\u2019s existence, experience and culture\u2026 are in the \u2018real world\u2019 of white and\/or male consciousness beneath consideration, invisible, unknown.\u201d Black feminist thought is subjugated knowledge that requires a level of insight to unearth.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Recognizing the unique standpoint of Black women is helpful in unearthing the salience of Black women\u2019s art.\u00a0 Since knowledge is socially constructed, sympathizing with, or taking heed to the unique standpoint of Black women helps tap into the meaning in their work.\u00a0 The social mediation of Black women\u2019s artwork relies upon the knowledge of the critic and her understanding of the lived experiences of Black women to better assess their work.\u00a0 The standpoint, whether feminist or androcentric, plays a primary role in the reading of Black women\u2019s artwork.\u00a0 There is no objective reading of an artwork; writing about and looking at art is very subjective. A person comes to an artwork with a lifetime of experiences, beliefs, and biases. Marguerite Helmers notes in \u201cFraming the Fine Arts Through Rhetoric\u201d that \u201cthe viewer operates from within a cultural situation that enables particular responses at particular times.\u201d Helmers states \u201cviewing is a transactional process.\u201d An Afrofemcenteric reading alleviates some of those biases by adhering to a framework that allows a close look and interpretation of the artwork based more on the characteristics of the artwork and less on the biases and beliefs of the critic.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Browse and shop for fine art from our growing network of artists, collectors, estates, galleries — specializing in works by Black American artists with great values on premier art.<\/p><\/div>\n

START COLLECTING ART<\/span><\/h1>\n

Sign up for our\u00a0free\u00a0email course<\/u><\/a>\u00a0<\/span>on how to begin your collection.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Shantay Robinson has participated in Burnaway<\/i>\u2019s\u00a0Art Writers Mentorship Program, Duke University\u2019s\u00a0The New New South\u00a0<\/i>Editorial Fellowship, and CUE Art Foundation\u2019s Art Critic Mentoring Program. She has written for\u00a0Burnaway, ArtsATL, ARTS.BLACK, AFROPUNK, Number, Inc.\u00a0<\/i>and\u00a0Washington City Paper<\/i>. While \u00a0receiving an MFA in Writing from Savannah College of Art and Design, she served as a docent at the High Museum of Art. She is currently working on a PhD in Writing and Rhetoric at George Mason University.<\/p>\n

Would you buy stock in BAIA if you could? Well we invite you to join us in becoming a monthly supporter, starting at just $3 a month\u00a0YOU<\/b>\u00a0become a stakeholder and begin to help us transform lives through art. We are growing the BAIA team and will use your contributions to hire more team members for the purpose of creating more educational and marketing resources for schools and universities about african american artists both past and present.
\n\u200b
\nReview our list of rewards for becoming a BAIA\u00a0
Patreon<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/span>\/ patron supporter. Your monthly contribution has lasting benefits. \u2014 \u201cWhat will your legacy be\u201d \u2013 Dr. Margaret Burroughs<\/p>\n

Thank you new and recurring monthly<\/span> Patrons<\/h1>\n

Deloris and Eddie Young<\/strong>,\u00a0Esther Silver-Parker<\/strong>,\u00a0Eugene Foney<\/strong>,\u00a0Petrucci Family Foundation Collection of African American Art<\/strong>,\u00a0National Black Arts Festival, Dr. Leslie Fields, Jim Nixon, Dr. Michael Butler,<\/strong>\u00a0Matthew Putman,\u00a0Grant Hill<\/strong>,\u00a0Frank Frazier<\/strong>,\u00a0Houston Museum of African American Culture<\/strong>,\u00a0Joan Crisler<\/strong>, Dee Greer, March on Washington Film Festival, Danny Jenkins,\u00a0Deborah L. McCullough<\/strong>, Ashlee Jacob, John and Melanie Guess, Tricia Konan, Michael Brinson,\u00a0Dr. A. Holloway<\/strong>, Rosie Gordon-Wallace, Jeanette D Adeshote,\u00a0 Ja-Na Bordes, Rev. Anita Marshall, Tricia Konan,\u00a0Robin King<\/strong>, Kerri L. Forrest, Nan, Thomas E. Rodgers, D. Lacy, Jeffery Washington, Brenda Larnell, Helen Oyekan, Jeffery Washington, Letashia Mosbey, Marian Darlington, Roslyn Valentine, Vyonne Diva, Ednarina Blake, Devera Redmond,\u00a0Reginald Browne<\/strong>, Carla West, Beatrice, Longshore, Abimbola Thompson, Barbara Johnson, Beverly C Smith, Deborah R. Moore, Dr. Skyller Walkes, Ednarina BLAKE, Garr Parks, Gerald Carrington, Jae M, James B Wingo, Jocelyne Lamour, Kevin Smokler, Marion Zweig, Mary Ali-Masai, Michael J. Todd, Nan, Reg Pugh, Shannon DeVaney, Thomas E. Rogers, Tonya Pendleton, D Lacy, Noreen Winningham, Mason Archie, Jill Scott, Cari Jackson Lewis, Patrick Stewart, Rachel Corbray, Cecilia Winters-Morris, Christ Van Loan Sr., Romaine Roberts, Michael Jacobs, K.L. Martin, Gale Ross, Manuelita Brown, Annette, Jamal Love, Glenn Isaac Sr, M. Rasheed, Angela Williams, Dana Todd Pope, Terese L Hawkins, Mark Everett Sanders, Kirby L. Coleman, Harold Moore, Fredric Isler, Dr. R. Locke, Queen Brooks, Charles Bibbs, Diana Shannon Young, Dr. Yonette Thomas, M Belinda Tucker, Karen Y House, Runez M Bender, Duke Windsor, Cheryl Odeleye, Stephen Bennett, Shawn Rhea, Ethnie Weekes, Paul Robinson, Janice Orr, Patricia D Dungy, Jocelyn Benita Smith, Joan L. Ward, Garr Parks, Pamela Carter, Carlton Cotton, Diane R Miles, Jean Ann Durades, Luthetis Carey, Susan Ross, Harry F Banks, Shelia McNair, Lorna Conley, Shelley Byrd, DeLores M Dyer, Stefanie Fe Steele, Marjorie Hammock, Celestine Hinnant, ALKEBU LAN IMAGES Bookstore, Deborah Paige-Jackson, Desiree Dansan, Karen Pinzolo, Sonia Spencer, James Whitten, Shelley Danzy, Linda Eaddy, Wilhelmina Barker, Dorothy Massey, Annie Cheffers, Maddy Markland, Kaileigh Nelson, Kellyn Maguire, Cory Huff, keishua, Megan LaCroix, Sara Friesen, Desir\u00e9e Stroud, Madison Taylor, Nina Marie, Mina Silva, Whitney, Toni Wendel, S F, Claire Sig, Isabel Engel, Sarah Drury, Elizabeth DeBunce, Hannah Diener, Diane Hughes, Petrina Burkard, Laura Di Piazza, Lisa Dunford Dickman, Jocelyn Greene, Cheryl B Blankman, Nicole Farley, Mitchell Shohet, Samiur Rashid, Sarah Rooney, Marina Kovic, Lloyd Goode, Sara, Pearlie Taylor, Lorna Doone, Ashley Littlefield, Monika Pi, Alison Deas, Carla Sonheim, Nicole Bruce, Brenda Keith, Louise berner-holmberg, Tellis, Pamela Hart, Kim Walker, Jessica Beckstrom, Franklin Jackson, Christina Levine, Curtis Morrow, jacki rust, Sarah Caputo, Freda Davis, cdixon06, Hollis Turner, \u00a0Laura Pereira, Danni Cerezo, Cooky Goldblatt,\u00a0Claudia Bell,\u00a0<\/strong>Gwen Ruff, Teri L Lewis, Emily Hegeman Cavanagh, Judith Bergeron, Suzette Renwick,\u00a0Beverly Grant<\/strong>, Kathleen Turner, Linda B. Smith, Joy Peters, Jea Delsarte, Reginald Laurent, Rita Crittenden,\u00a0Michele C. Mayes, Dr. Sandra Boyce Broomes<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

We Appreciate your support<\/p>\n

Share this:<\/h3>