{"id":5554,"date":"2019-07-28T14:55:30","date_gmt":"2019-07-28T14:55:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/media-archive.blackartinamerica.com\/?p=5554"},"modified":"2019-07-28T18:53:28","modified_gmt":"2019-07-28T18:53:28","slug":"tina-knowles-lawson-art-activist-extraordinaire-moves-the-culture-forward","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthexhibitions.org\/media-archive\/?p=5554","title":{"rendered":"Tina Knowles-Lawson:\u00a0 Art Activist Extraordinaire Moves the Culture Forward"},"content":{"rendered":"
By Debra Hand<\/span><\/pre>\nTo be cool anywhere in the world, you have to come through Black culture to do it.\u00a0 In both music and dance, Black culture is the dominant youth culture across the globe.\u00a0 So when it comes to Visual Art, why would we ever rely on outside cultural institutions to help set the bar for what we create and collect?\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nWith the current rush of traditional museums seeking Black art, it\u2019s a good time to examine what we can do on a collective basis to move our culture forward in the direction of our choosing; rather than have it moved along by the financial interests of others while we are merely swept along by default.\u00a0 This tends to happen to us in every area of art. We create it, we make it popular, it becomes an industry, and pretty soon we are on the outside looking in. Think Jazz, Rap, and Blues where non-Blacks are currently the largest financial stakeholders across the board. The subject-matter of our visual art still largely belongs to us, and it\u2019s a perfect moment in time for African-Americans to think about a new renaissance. \u00a0 We haven\u2019t had an extensive one since the Harlem Renaissance where Black artists, writers, poets, actors, and dancers collectively declared a new direction for culture.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nIn order for something like this to happen again, we need visionaries like Tina Knowles-Lawson to keep lighting the way.\u00a0 Lawson understands what cultural pride is and how to use it to effect change. She is a collector who was in the game long before many others became conscious about investing in our own images, and she used those images to help reinforce the esteems of her own children while growing up.\u00a0 Now she\u2019s using them to reach back into the community and strengthen the youth of this generation. Tina Knowles-Lawson is an extraordinary art activist whose work commands respect, and her annual Wearable Arts Gala presents a model that the culture can learn much from: namely that, our talent is enough.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nPresently, even with our own museums and art institutions in place, we continue to seek validation from the gatekeepers of traditional Western art values; we seek to be accepted into their historical art discourse and into their definition of what great art is, or what it should be.\u00a0 We do this, even as we know we\u2019ve been handed-down spectacular creative verve by previous generations\u2026talents handed to us by those who on a daily basis stretched creativity to its maximum possibilities, in order to survive. We have no doubt that African-American artists are worthy, and that they should never have to take a back seat on the bus — in deference to any other cultural group when it comes to creativity.\u00a0 Yet, Black artists have for too long been shown those backseats by so-called mainstream museums and art institutions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nFortunately there are now enough African-American collectors, enough Black Wealth, and enough everyday working people with disposable income to easily support our cultural aesthetic and the artists who create it.\u00a0 Still, we seem to seek out the validation of outside cultural institutions. There are many layers to the reason why, starting with the artists themselves.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nAs many Black artists come into the game, they long to receive those art credentials that say their work can stand alongside the \u201dbest\u201d of them.\u00a0 This is human nature. Our artists have long been treated as \u201cless than\u201d by mainstream museums and that need to prove ourselves is an ever-present shadow, waiting in watch for their acknowledgement of at least \u201cequal to.\u201d\u00a0 We tend to believe that those all-illusive credentials are finally granted by them to us when they accept our work into their museum exhibits, International Biennials, or when our work is presented at secondary-market auctions.\u00a0 What artist doesn\u2019t want to see collectors battling it out to pay millions for their work? In the art world, price tags can double as credentials, unfortunately. Likewise, African-American collectors enjoy knowing that the artists they collect are among the best of them, so all of the above serve as credentials that increase the artist\u2019s marketability and expands their name recognition.\u00a0 This leads to the most important question: in the eyes of mainstream museums, what defines the so-called best of them in American art? This answer is simple. The traditional requisites for who could qualify for the \u201cbest of them\u201d club was decided hundreds of years ago by Western scholars, curators, and art institutions that legally counted African-Americans as a race that was not fully human.\u00a0 As their art was evolving and the subject of their history was being transcribed in those cigar smoke filled rooms, we were invisible amongst them, beyond the servants refilling their coffee cups. The fact is, Western Art History is purposely the narrative of White artists. It was never intended to include Black people. But, over the course of time and events, African-American art has been slowly added to public museum collections; in some cases it\u2019s because institutions are legitimately taking steps to become more diverse in their collections, and in some cases it\u2019s because lack of diversity at certain public museums can now cause them to lose public funding.\u00a0 Additionally, African-American art is now in high demand and it offers museums a new way to engage the public and keep new patrons coming through the doors.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nNevertheless, none of this translates into mainstream museums suddenly having a sufficient understanding of the African-American art narrative.\u00a0 And the appointment of a Black curator here and there in a nation-wide conglomerate of institutions that have no significant scholarship in Black Art — does not an expert make.\u00a0 African-Americans are the only real experts on the subject of Black art and culture. We understand the shorthand of it\u2026the symbolism in it, because we have collectively shared the kinds of experiences that inspire it.\u00a0 We should be weighing in on these important discussions. If not, the requisites for what constitutes great Black art will be issued to us by those institutions, instead of the other way around. One thing is for certain, mainstream museums are noticing the collecting trends of prominent collectors.\u00a0 And they will take some clues from that as to what we think is important to reflect in our art. If you\u2019re a collector, your money speaks for you, even if you never choose to form the first syllable on this subject.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nIf you\u2019re on a museum board, or if you\u2019re a curator, then you\u2018re in a position to help translate our artistic ideals for those outside of the culture who can\u2019t interpret it on a visceral level, at least not as they might when assessing their own particular history in American art.\u00a0 I make that distinction because there are two separate art histories in play in those boardrooms, not one. African-American Art History has its own unique origin which began in Africa and continued in America after Africans were stolen and brought here. So, it\u2019s simply not correct to think of African-American Art History as merely a subset of American history.\u00a0 Rather, the two histories run parallel to each other, with only one of them beginning in America.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nAmerican art history began with the inception of American history.\u00a0 Our art history did not, but instead it began in Africa, endured beneath the oppression of slavery and Jim Crow, evolved through the Civil Rights Movement, etc., and arrived at the present day as one entity in its own right.\u00a0 African-American art should be respected by American museums as more than just an expanded footnote in American Art History. Its successful execution should not be measured against what Westerners have chosen to create to reflect their experiences in America.\u00a0 Logically, there should be significant differences between American Art and African-American art regarding subject-matter, symbolism, approaches, materials and techniques. We were, and still are, inhabiting two very separate realities.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nEvery cultural group has a story to tell, and in our desire to be recognized and accepted by so-called\u00a0 major art institutions, I hope we don\u2019t allow our beauty and truth to be edited away by their approval process.\u00a0 I hope our collectors will stand firmly together in the knowledge that \u201cour\u201d art is not less than \u2013 but rather, it is other than.\u00a0 And we should respect and celebrate that, just as every other culture celebrates it art and creativity with no requisites to conform to another\u2019s.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n