{"id":4632,"date":"2018-12-14T18:45:43","date_gmt":"2018-12-14T18:45:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/media-archive.blackartinamerica.com\/?p=4632"},"modified":"2018-12-24T18:50:39","modified_gmt":"2018-12-24T18:50:39","slug":"putting-their-money-where-the-black-art-is-museums-collect-african-american-art","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthexhibitions.org\/media-archive\/?p=4632","title":{"rendered":"Putting Their Money Where the Black Art Is: Museums Collect African American Art"},"content":{"rendered":"
By Shantay Robinson<\/span><\/pre>\n <\/p>\n
The mainstream art market opened up in the 1990s, allowing non-white and women artists entr\u00e9e into significant artworld institutions. In a 2004 talk delivered at the College Art Association\u2019s annual conference, Huey Copeland, now Associate Professor of Art History at Northwestern University, cites Amei Wallach from a 1990\u2019s <\/span>New York Newsday<\/span><\/i> article as writing,<\/span> \u201cThis year outsiders are in\u2026 And lots of museums, galleries, magazines and collectors are standing in line to seize the moment with artists whose skin colors, languages, national origins, sexual preferences or strident messages have kept them out of the mainstream.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Interestingly enough, 2018 represents a time similar to 1990, where museums and galleries are clamoring for African American art. The subject matter of African American art, which talks back to the status quo and creates rhetoric around black empowerment and appreciation lends itself nicely to postmodern critique, and may have allowed for its induction into the mainstream. But African American artists have been creating art that espouse black pride and have created artworks steeped in particularly black aesthetics for a long time, yet have not always been accepted by dominant artworld institutions. <\/span><\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The news is that African American art is hot in the world of art collecting right now. <\/span>Bloomberg<\/span><\/i> published an article on April 18, 2018 describing the \u201cscramble\u201d that\u2019s happening over African American art. The <\/span>Bloomberg<\/span><\/i> article quotes,<\/span> Ann Temkin, chief curator of painting and sculpture at MoMA, as she states, \u201cThey\u2019re part of a very rich and textured history that we weren\u2019t really committed to exploring\u2026 [museums have to] literally pay for the fact that we weren\u2019t as actively engaged in this a decade ago.\u201d According to the article, MoMA has collected more than 430 works by black artists over the past decade. <\/span>Culture Type<\/span><\/i> reported, in MoMA\u2019s 2016 Annual Report it is recorded that more than 50 works of more than 1,000 artworks collected were by African Americans in 2015-2016. <\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Because Kehinde Wiley and Amy Sherald were enlisted to create the portraits of the first African American president and the first lady which were revealed in February 2018, collectors have become more interested in catching up on black proclivities. With the unveiling of the presidential portrait came the realization that black artists are and have been creating great art for a very long time, but haven\u2019t been appropriately recognized for it. It seems like museums across the country are just starting to see the value in collecting art by African American artists. While African Americans have been documented to have been creating art in this country since the 1700s by the likes of Joshua Johnson, the recent uptick in collecting black art doesn\u2019t seem too coincidental.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
From looking at the news about acquisitions of black art on <\/span>Culture Type<\/span><\/i>, this year was very active with eight articles about acquisitions published, whereas there were three stories of acquisitions in 2017 and two in 2016. This may by no means be an accurate reflection of the work being done by museums across the country, but the number of articles in 2018 compared to 2017 and 2016 might be quite telling. Some of the acquisitions in 2018 include: Pope L. by the Carnegie Museum of Art in Pittsburgh; Amy Sherald, Isaac Julien, Njideka Akunyili Crosby, Wangechi Mutu, and Jack Whitten at the Baltimore Museum of Art; Emma Amos, Betye Saar, and Dread Scott at the Brooklyn Museum of Art; Isaac Julien and Wangechi Mutu at Ruby City in San Antonio, Texas; Glenn Ligon, McArthur Binion, and Benny Andrews at Mississippi Museum of Art; Betye Saar and Julie Mehretu at Los Angeles County Museum of Art; and Dawoud Bey, \u00a0Willie Cole, and Carrie Mae Weems at Bowdoin College Museum of Art. <\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
On September 21, 2018, <\/span>Artnet <\/span><\/i>published an article and study titled, \u201cAfrican American Artists Are More Visible Than Ever. So Why Are Museums Giving Them Short Shrift?\u201d where they attempt to reconcile how museums can make up for lost time by collecting artworks by African American artists more intentionally. This article seems na\u00efve to the reality of the system. To ask why museums are giving black artists the short shrift, is to not recognize the changes needed in our society to afford black artists equal opportunity. The article is well-meaning, though. They reported, in 2018, that over the past decade less than 3% of the art acquired by the 30 museums they studied were created by African American artists even while African Americans make up 12% of the population. What might be surprising to some, they report, is that nine months into 2018, the 30 museums surveyed had already acquired 439 artworks by African American artists. <\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
Museums and galleries at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) are priceless for collecting artworks by African American artists at times mainstream institutions ignored black artists. While the Brooklyn Museum, the Philadelphia Museum of Art, Newark Museum and Smithsonian have been ahead of the curve, many museums are just now catching up. In a controversial move to diversify their collection, Baltimore Museum of Art\u2019s director, Christopher Bedford, decided to sell seven artworks by prominent white male artists, including Andy Warhol, Robert Rauschenberg, and Franz Kline in order to collect works by people of color and women. The truth is, deaccession, as it is known, selling off artworks where there is already great depth in the collection, is done by museums regularly. And this deaccession was a decision made by both the curators of the museum and the community.<\/span><\/p>\n