{"id":12774,"date":"2022-06-30T11:44:11","date_gmt":"2022-06-30T11:44:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/media-archive.blackartinamerica.com\/?p=12774"},"modified":"2022-08-02T12:26:42","modified_gmt":"2022-08-02T12:26:42","slug":"is-art-recession-proof","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthexhibitions.org\/media-archive\/?p=12774","title":{"rendered":"Is Art Recession-Proof?"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n
By Yvonne Bynoe<\/pre>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nAround the country gas prices and rents are at record highs, coupled with product shortages in grocery stores and drug stores. Consequently, some financial experts are predicting another recession. Understandably, collectors are looking for ways to weather the storm should it come.<\/p>\r\n
While every collector hopes that the work he or she acquires appreciates in value, increasingly Black Americans are purchasing art as part of their investment portfolios. This means that a collector whose main motivation is acquiring art as a financial asset has to make different decisions than the collector who views the appreciation of their art as an unexpected bonus.<\/p>\r\n
Before providing further insights, it’s important to first give some context about what impacts art prices.<\/em><\/p>\r\n
Overall, the factor that most influences the rise in art prices is scarcity. Art is one of the few assets where supply decreases over time. After an important artist dies, his\/her works are often acquired by museums so there’s a limited number of works for sale in the art markets. For example, Jean-Michel Basquiat, one of the most influential artists of the 20th century, was known to have been a prolific painter. However, in 2021, only 18 Basquiat paintings sold, totaling $258 million in sales.<\/p>\r\n
In the case of living artists, such as 2021 MacArthur “Genius Award” winner, Jordan Casteel, Amaoko Boafo, Mickalene Thomas or a rising star such as Oklahoma-based artist Robert Peterson, increased interest by institutions or by private collectors can quickly result in higher prices for their available work.<\/p>\r\n
The selling price of a sought after artist, living or dead, goes as high as the market will bear. <\/em><\/p>\r\n
The recent sale of Ernie Barnes’s (1938-2009) iconic 1976 painting, Sugar Shack<\/em> is a prime example of the above statement. Based on prior sales of Barnes’s work, Christie’s had placed their auction estimate at $150,000-200,000. However, a bidding war ensued between African-American hedge fund manager Bill Perkins and another prospective buyer. When the dust settled, the work was sold to Perkins for $15.275 million.<\/p>\r\n
Various studies have shown that the art market doesn’t correlate with the stock market. This means that art tends to sell well even when the U.S. economy is doing poorly. In financial circles, art is considered a “currency neutral asset.” The art market is roughly divided into quarters between the United States, Western Europe, China and the rest of the world. Subsequently, a market downturn in one art market doesn’t necessarily impact the value of a work. If there’s a recession in the U.S., a collector could still sell his\/her painting in Hong Kong for a great price.<\/p>\r\n
The caveat is that generally during a down market masterpieces still command high prices, while lower priced works lose value. In other words, blue chip art will always do well\u2014even in a recession. (Blue chip art are works priced at $500,000 or more.) Art industry analysts maintain that works that consistently hold their values are by well-known artists that are estimated between $100K and $1M in major art markets such as New York and London.<\/p>\r\n
The standard for valuing art is based on two main criteria: predictability of returns and cultural significance.<\/p>\r\n
Predictability<\/strong> of returns<\/strong>:<\/p>\r\n
This is the sales history of the artist. Wealthier collectors (or their art advisors) use auction sales data to examine the rate of appreciation of an artist’s work over the course of his\/her career. These collectors are wary of artists without a solid sales track record. They fear that an unseasoned artist may have one or two high selling works followed by a succession of flops that would depreciate their oeuvre.<\/em><\/p>\r\n
Cultural Significance<\/strong>:<\/p>\r\n
This is a very <\/em>subjective assessment of how important an artist is to society based on the views of art industry elites. This measurement is chiefly about what recognized art industry people and entities the artist is associated with, including but not limited to: what museums are collecting the artist’s work, which galleries the artist has exhibited with, and whether the artist’s audience reach is national or international.<\/p>\r\n
What does all of this mean for the “average” affluent collector who will spend $35,000-$40,000 on their collection during their lifetimes?\u00a0 <\/em><\/p>\r\n
The short answer is that there’s no surefire way to recession-proof your collection. Although all financial investments carry some level of risk, in the art market, lower priced works tend to experience higher volatility.<\/p>\r\n