{"id":11896,"date":"2022-03-25T14:47:47","date_gmt":"2022-03-25T14:47:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/media-archive.blackartinamerica.com\/?p=11896"},"modified":"2022-03-25T23:15:20","modified_gmt":"2022-03-25T23:15:20","slug":"is-it-ethical-to-sell-a-gift-of-artwork-from-an-artist-once-they-make-it-big-by-debra-hand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earthexhibitions.org\/media-archive\/?p=11896","title":{"rendered":"\u201cIs it Ethical to Sell a Gift of Artwork from an Artist Once They Make it Big?\u201d by Debra Hand"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n
by Debra Hand<\/pre>\r\nOoh wee!\u00a0 Don\u2019t get me started!\u00a0 Immediately, several answers come to mind.\u00a0 Yes, several.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\r\n
For non-artists, the answer to this question might be as simple as, \u201cWhy not?\u201d After all, when you own something, it\u2019s yours to do with as you please. Why should a gift of art be any different, right?<\/p>\r\n
Well, the answer is not quite that cut-and-dry\u2026 especially where artists are concerned.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\r\n
Many artists suffer hurt feelings after gifting their artwork to someone\u2014or selling it to them at such an extreme discount that it may as well have been a gift\u2014only to have that person rush to sell it once the artist\u2019s career takes off? Now, don\u2019t get me wrong. I certainly understand that there are various reasons why someone might sell a gifted artwork, but in every case, there are additional elements worth considering.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n
Let\u2019s just start with this\u2026\u00a0<\/p>\r\n
In any friendship, there should be ethics at work. If your friendships include gifts of original art, honoring the standards of that friendship should also extend to those art gifts. Yes. A gift is a gift. This is legally true and, technically, once an artist gives up ownership of a work, that\u2019s the end of their say in that piece. However, a gift of someone\u2019s original artwork is precisely the thing that qualifies it for such unique consideration. In giving their art as a gift, the artist is choosing to give that work out of some degree of honor, respect, or friendship, and they are choosing that person to be the benefactor of the work of their heart and hands. In effect, the artist is entrusting ownership of that work to a very \u201cspecific person\u201d for that person\u2019s specific ownership and enjoyment. So, in a way, the artwork itself is only one part of the gift; the other part of the gift is the entrusted custodianship of that particular work-of-art.\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\r\n
Even without the artist ever stating it aloud or handing the person a contract, most people receiving such a gift do so with the clear understanding that the artist is entrusting them with something deeply personal.\u00a0 They know that this gift is different than someone gifting them a set of bookends or a mass-produced item that is available to anyone on the open market. And they certainly understand (in this touching moment) that the artist doesn\u2019t expect them to take the gift and speed to the nearest auction house to sell it.<\/p>\r\n
These assumptions are baked into that lovely moment, even without words. So it becomes a mere technicality whether the receiver rushes off to sell the gift that day, or whether they hold onto it for a few years before selling it. The point is, if they sell it, they should be aware that the beautiful gesture of their friend gifting them with art out of respect may very well be trampled on as a result of that sale. Of course, there are some artists that such a sale won\u2019t bother, but that would likely be the exception\u2014UNLESS there are extenuating circumstances.\u00a0<\/p>\r\n
Now, we all know that life is complicated and difficulties occur. So what happens when the owner of that gifted work just flat-out needs to sell their valuables to make ends meet? Should they be made to feel guilty about selling that gift? I think this leads to the real question: Namely, did the person sell the piece because they were in real need, or did they sell it to make a quick buck without regard for the artist\u2019s feelings or the friendship? In effect, this topic reduces down to three simple words: need or greed?<\/p>\r\n
I think most artists are reasonable enough to understand extenuating circumstances that might lead a person to have to sell an art gift, but how can an artist know a person\u2019s motives if the person never bothers to reach out to them before the sale? \u00a0From the standpoint of an artist, they can sell their own work. They don\u2019t need to funnel it through a friend in the form of a gift along the way, only to see that piece end up on the open market, acquired by someone they never meant to have that piece in the first place.\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\r\n
I remember a lesson I learned through the legendary Dr. Margaret Burroughs, principal founder of the DuSable Museum.\u00a0 She mentored me on many aspects of being an artist. Early in my practice, she told me the story of how someone came to see her artwork in her home. While the person was there, they gushed over Dr. Burroughs\u2019 art to the point that she generously gifted the person with one of her pieces. Dr. Burroughs said, \u201cThe next thing I knew, I was looking at that same piece in a show with a big ole price tag on it.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\r\n